On 4 February 2016 at 15:17, Dale H. Cook <radiot...@juno.com> wrote:
> It is unusable in one important way. This thread began as a discussion of 
> running serial port terminal emulators on a PC. At work I still use some 
> MS-DOS programs (admittedly not terminal emulators) over serial ports. For my 
> purposes (setting up a variety of vintage specialized hardware over RS-232) 
> NT-based operating systems are sometimes unusable because they present the 
> application program with a virtual serial port, and MS-DOS programs running 
> under those operating systems cannot read from or write to the UART 
> registers. Some of the setup programs for that vintage hardware were written 
> before the mid-1990s and access the UART registers, so I have to run those 
> under Win98 or earlier. I have a portable MS-DOS 3.3 machine that I use to 
> set up that vintage hardware.

A fair point, but then, one is not going to use MS-DOS to browse the
Web in 2016, right? Even the handful of ancient DOS web browsers can't
handle the modern Web.

There's a big difference between a "daily driver" and a specialist tool.


-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)

Reply via email to