On 11/05/2016 23:08, "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Adrian Graham > <wit...@binarydinosaurs.co.uk> wrote: >>> Some others had a PRO as their console. Don't remember which models >>> specifically. >> The 8{3|5}50s our biggest customer used had Pro380 VAX CONSOLES > > Not the 82xx/83xx, but the larger 85xx, 87xx and 88xx... Machines with > a Nautilus bus, mostly. The 8200|8250|8300|8350 were more like a > VAX-11/750 where the console "processor" was embedded into the CPU. My memory's getting skewed with age, clearly. I can remember RKG's (Royal Kingdom of Geordies) finest 2 engineers upgrading the 8350s to 8550s and the passage of time has me convinced it was 'only' a backplane swap. I was purely a code monkey back then. One thing that definitely happened was the MD of this company was going to have his new VAXen removed again because they didn't have blinkenlights. > Nope. TSX-11 was not a DEC product. Pro350s and Pro380s (Pro325 > didn't have a hard disk) usually ran P/OS, an RSX derivative for the > Professional series. You could also get RT-11 for the Pro, as well as > VENIX, but when used as a VAX console, it was P/OS and some > menus/assets for being a console. It's not hard to repurpose them. Aaah P/OS! Yes, I think it's all the recent chat on here about TSX-11 that had me thinking that's what was running. The box of floppies I got might contain P/OS disks....Tomorrow I'll grab the RCD socket from the kitchen and plug said console in and will be prepared to be amazed if the RD51 spins up. -- Adrian/Witchy Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer collection?