> Spam should reduce when word gets around that spammers are being
> tortured to death.

I doubt it, some one will invent a religion that says tortured spammers get
to heaven first......

Yeah, wow.. not to put too fine a point on it, HA!



On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Dave Wade <dave.g4...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fred
> Cisin
> > Sent: 11 August 2016 16:38
> > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> > <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> > Subject: Re: Spam [was Re: still looking for that stuff?]
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, geneb wrote:
> > > I think it would be more effective to stuff the spammer into a Brazen
> > > Bull and then force his children/family members to light the fire.
> > > Televise it across all media outlets.  Spam should slow to a tiny,
> > > tiny, trickle after one or two of these little events...
> >
>
> Firstly, there are many types of unwanted e-mail, and using the term SPAM
> to
> cover them all is a dis-service.
> A lot of reported SPAM simply comes from lists folks have signed up to, and
> who can't be bothered to un-sign themselves off the list.
>
> The e-mail in question was not one of those, it was almost certainly sent
> by
> a criminal attempting to steal and re-sell some ones credentials.
>
> I am fairly certain the e-mail originated from 102.47.65.89. Sticking that
> into an Internet Search engine reports...
>
> IP General Information
>
> IP Address: 103.47.65.89
> Hostname: 103.47.65.89
> ISP: Zapbytes Technologies Pvt.
>
> Geolocation Information
>
> Continent: Asia (AS)
> Country: India (IN) IN
> City: Delhi
> Latitude: 28.6667 (28°40'0.12" N), Longitude: 77.2167 (77°13'0.12" N)
>
>
> > Spam should reduce when word gets around that spammers are being
> > tortured to death.
>
> I doubt it, some one will invent a religion that says tortured spammers get
> to heaven first......
>
> >
> > Decriminalize spammercide.
> >
> >
> > Spread the word - "spammers are already being murdered."
> >
> >
> Dave
> G4UGM
>
>
>

Reply via email to