> > Indeed. Think 'PARRY meets Dissociated Press'. > > Thank you. > That explained why the content looked ALMOST relevant. > > The word and phrase usage would seem likely to be able to fool a Salton > style vector space (cosine) relevance ranking system! > > > I still don't understand what his motivation is. If the nonsense were > accompanied by a URL, then it would be obvious. But, I guess that just > being disruptive was all that he was after. >
It's possible that there was a URL in the HTML part of the mail. This list apparantly strips off any HTML parts in emails posted so we would not have seen it. Regards, Peter Coghlan.
