> No, C64's were too limited (8-bit) to do anything video related. I'm going to be strenuously pedantic: the bittedness of the 6510 isn't why it's a less optimal video candidate, the relatively limited video output (which is the VIC-II, not the CPU) is. 320x200 probably has enough bit detail but the 8x8 colour limitation is crippling, and 160x200 even on a TV screen is blocky.
But we definitely used it for video in lo-fi cheap productions. The 40x25 text mode is more than enough for some very basic titling, and it has separated video as well. -- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- Talking about art is like dancing about architecture. -- Frank Zappa -------
