On 01/29/2017 01:55 AM, couryho...@aol.com wrote: > Honeywell Datamatic 1000 uses 3 inch wide tape > we have a 3 inch very very heavy reel and the 30 something track tape > drive head.... could this someday be the start of the ultimate DIY tape > drive build and tape recover? > > see more on this computer here... and we have modules for this tube > computer we need to photo and more stuff to scan and add. > http://www.smecc.org/honeywell_datamatic_1000.htm
(Apology for the previous null message--hit the wrong button) The tape used appears to be an early videotape formulation, but wider than the initial 2 inch format used in Ampex's early machines. It's a sandwich affair with the magnetic oxide in the middle of two sheets of mylar, so it should be pretty durable. While there are 32 tracks on the tape, they're not used in parallel; a given word is recorded serially on a track. A good thing--deskewing 32 tracks would be a real issue for early electronics. The curious thing about the recording format is that blocks consisting of recorded words are interlaced with respect to direction. Thus, every other block is recorded while moving in a forward direction, while the same holds for the tape going in the reverse direction. The general idea is to minimize wasted space taken up by IRGs. The tape units were buffered, such that a read could be initiated while still processing data from a previous read operation. The programmer could take advantage of the fact that data from a read operation began arriving some 200 clocks from read initiation. All in all, a fascinating view into early design. --Chuck