Apparently some of Hewlett's papers went to Stanford
"Two new collections open for research: Helen and Newton Harrison & William 
Hewlett"
http://library.stanford.edu/blogs/special-collections-unbound/2016/04/two-new-collections-open-research-helen-and-newton
 

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sharpe [mailto:couryho...@aol.com] 
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:19 PM
To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Tubbs fire consumed the collected archives of William Hewlett and 
David Packard

Karen Lewis felt Stanford  was the place they should go... 

ed#

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail

On Sunday, October 29, 2017 Steven M Jones via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> 
wrote:
General comment to several earlier replies re: Bitsavers-type efforts.

The tragedy here is not that some copies of uncommon but otherwise extant 
product documentation were lost. From the description, there were a large 
number of unique, individual documents created by significant historical 
figures. Fair bet that many of these didn't exist anywhere else. Certainly not 
if it included drafts of speeches and correspondence, as well as the final 
copy, etc.

A better question (not that it does any good to ask it now) is why this stuff 
wasn't in the hands of university conservators or similar. I love bitsavers and 
warchive.org, but this is a level beyond what they typically focus on. (And to 
be sure, CHM would have at least kept such artifacts safe even if they couldn't 
do anything with them for a few
years/decades.)

Sigh. And I don't really mean to criticize anybody at Keysight, humans are 
generally bad at recognizing and planning for this kind of contingency - and 
I'm probably worst than most...

--S.



Reply via email to