On 11/20/2017 05:40 AM, allison via cctalk wrote: > Creating a bus to accommodate any one cpu at a time is far more > straightforward and there are plenty of > examples than one that is running a mix of many cpus.
Oddly enough, I'm in agreement. :) Today, it really makes little sense to have memory, CPU and high-speed peripherals on separate bus slots. At least for the cases being discussed, memory is dense and inexpensive enough that there's really no good reason to put it somewhere else. Data transfer between peripheral devices and CPUs is a different matter and can be handled by existing serial buses--which is what I thought the original question was. --Chuck