On 09/06/2018 09:37 AM, Carlo Pisani via cctalk wrote: > cause it's the simples, I guess >
The VT100 was quite complicated compared to contemporary terminals at the time of its introduction. On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I used to naively think that the VT100 was the lowest end Video Terminal. > Then I subsequently saw references to VT50 and VT52. So now I have no clue. > If you think those were crude, take a look at the VT05, DEC's first standalone serial video terminal.