> On Feb 19, 2019, at 8:00 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>> As I see it, flux transition hardware COULD be all that is needed for 
>> hardware.  Emulation of FDC could be done in software with flux transition 
>> hardware.
> 
> That should read flux transition plus appropriate control signals for the 
> drive.  Seeking tracks, turn on the drives R/W circuitry, etc.
> Flux transition ITSELF is just making sense out of the pulses on the track.

Rather than flux transitions, flux levels would seem even better.  If the flux 
levels are sliced and reduced to square waves, you've lost a bunch of 
information that could have helped recover marginal data.

I' reminded of the Bordynuik tape reading machine that uses an MR head.  
Capturing analog flux levels at, say, 10x the nominal flux change density means 
all the rest is simply digital signal processing.  That can be done in real 
time if you must, but much more easily in post processing using whatever tools 
and languages you like.

        paul

Reply via email to