Yes, and although it rarely happens, and is just shrugged off as "something didn't go right with that scan", ARTIFACTS can sometimes occur.
Addendum: that particular source of artifacts won't happen if scanning the
300DPI original with a scan resolution other than 300DPI.
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruct... Steve Malikoff via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction of o... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction ... Jason T via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruct... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruct... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is dest... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is... ED SHARPE via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is dest... ED SHARPE via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is... ED SHARPE via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question... ED SHARPE via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction ... Christian Corti via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruct... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction of o... ben via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction ... Jon Elson via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruct... ED SHARPE via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruct... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction of o... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Scanning question (Is destruction of old te... Chris Hanson via cctalk