On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Rob Jarratt via cctalk wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cctalk <cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Al Kossow via > > cctalk > > Sent: 17 June 2020 13:55 > > To: cctalk@classiccmp.org > > Subject: Re: Future of cctalk/cctech > > > > > > > > > I wonder what you don't like about "groups.io" Its pretty much a > > pure mailing list? > > > > Like all of the webby time-wasters, they don't have easy to mirror > > zipped archives, because they want to to spend time hovering > > around clicking on their sites. > > > > > > http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/ > > > > > > The one thing I would change here is removal of the restriction on > > attachments. > > > > Well, two things.. Getting rid of the cctalk/cctech split as well. > > I would agree with both of those too. > > Rob
I concur. And I also would like to mention a simple, easily navigable web interface to list archives, which works well in text based browser. Just like the current one. Having such interface is a huge plus for me. It allows both access to single threads, message by message, and getting full mbox for more sophisticated processing (in theory at least, since I have no such needs yet). "Modern" interfaces, while touting their bestness, are about removing as much power from end user as possible, IMHO. -- Regards, Tomasz Rola -- ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. ** ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home ** ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... ** ** ** ** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com **