On 1/24/21 8:11 PM, Chris Zach wrote:
Ok. My guess is it throws off the cache on the 11/73 and above as it works in an 11/23 (which is soooooo slow!).

I looked at the images, cut the traces, then soldered in two of the wires. Board did not work on either the 11/83 or the 11/23+ CPU. However when I looked closer I saw the tiny little wire down by the crystal and the Q bus fingers. Put that in, and the board now works on the 11/23+, will take the whole thing apart (again) and plug in the 11/83.

Fortunately I have the pdp11/83 configured with a Q bus memory board (2-4mb) and a PMI memory board from an 11/84 placed in slot 2 (so the 11/83 will access it as Q Bus memory). Thus I could pull the 11/83 CPU in slot 1 and pop the 11/23+ in. Aside from the exceptionally slower speed and long boot times it works pretty well for testing.

Still need to get a 11/83 compatible PMI board, but the 11/84 ones work as normal Q bus memory.

Thanks! Now I can read some of these RX02 disks and image them. I'm guessing my BRU floppy that I generated with the RXV11 controller will not boot on this RXV21 controller so I'll have to re-make that. And so far it doesn't look like the disks made on that third party MXV21 controller are compatible with the RX02, should they be?

Chris

Congrats!

Most of the third party controllers and drives are OS compatible with the RX01 + RX02 format, provided you stick with Single Sided media.  However, booting an OS with an RX01 controller handler (Interrupt driven) will not succeed with an RX02 controller (DMA) or vice-versa.

The Double Sided media (RX03) make for interesting interchange stories. I've seen double sided single density floppies. There are also differences in how the controller vendors made disk handler modifications for RT11.   Many of these controllers would allow you to perform a low level format, but only using vendor specific controller commands.   The DEC RX02 will only change the funky media density.

Remember that these are 18 bit controllers.   Some operation systems can work around this limitation, at the expense of CPU cycles.

  Jerry

Reply via email to