I don’t refer to them as Audio-phools.

They are GESR’s. (pronounced guesser)

Golden
Eared
Sonic
Reviewers

They guess this sounds better than that, so it must be worth it.

        David

> On May 5, 2021, at 6:31 PM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> I think a lot of the time audio-phools, if they will be honest with 
> themselves, are really trying to recreate the stereo (or even HiFi) sounds of 
> the 1960s because they have fond memories and like it better.  THAT I have no 
> problem with whatsoever.
> 
> What gets annoying is when the phools try and convince others that this old 
> gear somehow more accurately reproduces recordings or that the "fleecy" stuff 
> referred to actually makes things better.  Oh well.
> 
> JRJ
> 
> On 5/5/2021 8:14 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
>> On 05/05/2021 07:44 PM, Donald via cctalk wrote:
>>> Many thanks for all the info. I just wanted to make sure my recesses were
>>> right.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I asked about MG because, in an audio forum, I see folks paying crazy money
>>> for AC cords and power line conditioners.  I thought a good MG would solve
>>> many of the 'problems' they are trying to fix.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Oh, that's audio-phoolery, the discussion topic of lots of people with a 
>> real understanding of electronics and physics.  The audiophools have NO 
>> understanding, just "belief".  And, they get fleeced regularly by this kind 
>> of stuff.
>> Jon

Reply via email to