Thanks! I found the PCL11 in the 1980 Terminals and Communications
handbook, but the biggest thing they had was the COMM/IO/DUP
micro-controller that ran up to 6 DZ11's for 48 terminals. And that was
in the Customer Specific Solutions section.
No mention of what the DMX11 was, but it must have been a beast: One
thing I do see in this report is that DEC went nuts because the customer
was holding them to an interesting set of requirements that changed
mid-project.
From what I can see, it was some sort of a "block mode" device that
could support 64 terminals at a shot. Then the client/DEC also wanted it
to drive VT52's in character mode as well because the "Terminal
Concentrator Device" (no idea what that was) was not going to be
supported by RSX11/D going forward. It was still supported in RSX11/M
now I'm wondering what THAT device was as well.
Anyway trying to stuff character mode and block mode in the same
controller doubled the microcode requirements. Worse, they couldn't lay
out the components on a nine board layout and the customer refused to
allow more boards to make it fit. So it had "problems".
So what was a TCD? Was that a pdt11/150 by chance?
C
On 10/25/2021 2:16 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
On Oct 23, 2021, at 10:16 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
wrote:
Anyone know about the Dec DMX11? It was apparently a 64 serial line Mux that
plugged into pdp11 Unibus systems and had a fair amount of both intelligence
and insanity on board. Reason is I'm looking into some old documentation about
late 1970's Tote systems for Asian race tracks and the system they were
building was beyond astronomical in terms of insanity.
(As in an 8 way pdp11/70 system cluster, with 11/04's running these DMX11's to
hundreds of terminals)
The April 1983 Options & Modules List (see
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/modules/modulesAndOptions/) shows it on page 156. It is listed as a
CSS product, 64 line mux controller (DMA both ways, so similar to the DH11) with separate 64-port line
cards. Three flavors of line card: 20 mA loop, "EIA" (presumably that means RS-232) and
"Differential" -- perhaps RS-422?
Date is given as 08/1980, but that's the last update of the entry. Status is "6". The April 1983
document is missing its cover material which explains the codes, but the December 1975 edition (same
Bitsavers directory) lists them. "6" means "Obsolete, but can still be custom-built".
Given that it's a CSS device, documentation for it is likely to be hard to
find, and software for it even harder. For example, while RSTS would be a
natural OS to support this (given that it can handle 128 terminal lines) it
doesn't and as far as I know never has.
paul
