> On Apr 4, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Warner Losh via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > That's what a sanitize operation does. It forgets the key and reformats the > metadata with a new key. Yes, but the devil is in the details. For example, for the SSD case, it is necessary verify that the flash block that previously held the key information has been explicitly erased (successfully) and not merely put on the free list. That's a detail I once pried out of a manufacturer, insisting they were required to answer in order to get the business. paul
- SETI@home (ca. 2000) servers heading to salva... Eric J. Korpela via cctalk
- Re: SETI@home (ca. 2000) servers heading... emanuel stiebler via cctalk
- Re: SETI@home (ca. 2000) servers hea... Eric J. Korpela via cctalk
- Re: SETI@home (ca. 2000) servers heading... Mark Linimon via cctalk
- Re: SETI@home (ca. 2000) servers heading... Sytse van Slooten via cctalk
- Data recovery (was: Re: SETI@home (ca. 2... Jules Richardson via cctalk
- Re: Data recovery (was: Re: SETI@hom... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Data recovery (was: Re: SETI... Chris Zach via cctalk
- Re: Data recovery (was: Re: ... Jonathan Chapman via cctalk
- Re: Data recovery (was: Re: ... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Data recovery (was:... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Data recovery (was: Re: SETI@hom... Ethan O'Toole via cctalk