SOMEWHERE I  HAVE  THIS AMAZING FACIT  PUNCH AN READER CATALOG  BOOK THING,,,  
TONS OF  UNITS BEAUTY PHOTOS   .... WHAT IS THE DATE ON THE UNITS  YOU SEEK 
INFO ON??
THANKS ED#
In a message dated 7/10/2022 11:32:29 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: 
Google turns up very little specific information on either of these devices, 
e.g. nil return from bit savers. The best leads I have are:- The UTR 700 was 
badge engineered by Ferranti into FM1600B systems, one of which fetched up at 
the Centre for Computer History, Cambridge, England; perhaps with 
documentation.  Also, as it was used in government systems some maintenance 
documentation may have fetched up in the PRO, at Kew.- Some Facit 4060 
documentation, for the 4060, its 4061 & 4063 chums and the 5106 interface, look 
to be lodged in Box 52 of the ICL Collection at the Science Museum Library. The 
UTR 700 reader looks to be parallel interfaced, 10 single ended outputs from an 
interface card.  The jokes start with manufacturer codes, rather than OEM part 
numbers on the 14 pin DIL ICs.  However, a little scope work should identify 
tape out, data 0..7 and strobe lines.  More interesting questions are 
lubrication and capacitor replacement - where a schematic would be a great 
assistance in deciding how to proceed.  etc etc The Facit 4060 punch contains 
no more than the electro-mechanical mechanism : AC drive motor, solenoids and 
rotary position sensors.  The 4070 documentation (on BitSavers) may read 
across, in terms of sensor characteristics, solenoid operating voltages and 
snubbing needs, or it may not.  That reconstructing the schematic would be 
straightforward simply identifies how much is missing, and the difficulty of 
specifying it in the abscence of documentation.  A classic tape punch interface 
from data latch and ready, through position sensing, solenoid drivers and done 
logic is required, together with auxiliary indications, e.g. tape out.  etc etc 
Any information, wisdom, documentation or pointers to sources would be very 
much appreciated. To state the obvious, I was passed these devices by Philip 
Belben Martin

Reply via email to