> On May 4, 2025, at 3:06 PM, Johan Helsingius via cctalk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 04/05/2025 20:39, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > >> A language for which specific machines have been built a number of times is >> FORTH > > Another is Lisp. Good point. And yet another is ALGOL 60 -- the Burroughs mainframes are stack machines nicely matched to what ALGOL needs, and Burroughs created several special-purpose languages based on ALGOL for that machine. The OS uses one (ESPOL); there is one for the communications machinery (DC-ALGOL) and it has a compiled ALGOL variant called WFL (work flow language) for the batch job control. (As an analogy, imagine if "bash" were a compiler rather than an interpreter.) paul
- [cctalk] Wang TTL BASIC Steve Lewis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BASIC jos via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BASIC ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BASIC Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BASIC Johan Helsingius via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BA... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TT... Johan Helsingius via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TT... Martin Bishop via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BASIC Steve Lewis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BASIC Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TTL BA... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TT... Martin Bishop via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wang TT... Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wan... David Wade via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wan... Brian L. Stuart via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Wan... Steve Lewis via cctalk
