I understand exactly where you're coming from. It's easy enough to make a 
secondary storage emulator but unless it's electromechanical it's not the same, 
is it? I still use SCSI tape drives day to day "because". Currently LTO, with 
autochangers. A RAID would work out a lot cheaper per Mb, but has no charm.

In your position, how about cassette, as you suggested? A Kansas City circuit 
is easy enough to make. I use the schematics from Ohio Scientific computers 
(e.g 600 board) as a reference circuit, largely because it's what I used in the 
1970s.

I also got myself a solenoid controlled tape deck and interfaced it to my 
computer for Random Access. Disk drives were extremely expensive. Whether this 
was entirely practical is another matter, but who cares? I got a Sharp deck 
with APSS(?) which was a feature that would fast forward and rewind looking for 
silence between tracks, and stop when it found some.

With tape decks you really need four to do interesting things. These days 
that's affordable.

Paper tape? I have it but it's less practical - especially as you can't get 
supplies easily. I started on paper tape and upgraded to cassette. The system 
software I had at the time assumed paper but the cassette dropped in as a 
hardware compatible replacement. The only snag was that once started the CPU 
had to process it at the speed it came, whereas the paper tape was 
starting/stop.


Regards, Frank



On 21 June 2025 05:58:16 BST, ben via cctalk <[email protected]> wrote:
>Now that I have my 18 bit retro computer working, I am thinking of adding 
>classic IO, like paper tape. Sadly I am a few decades too late.
>Is there anything out there to replace a punch/reader used as 70's i/o?
>Any good mag tape (cassete tape) replacements? I would love a tiny 9 track mag 
>tape toy sized if they made one, like the wall hanging PDP8's.
>On wish list, a flex writer or TTY video display replacement, ie overstrike 
>and underline in 2/3 size VT100 case.
>Ben.
>https://www.instructables.com/23-Scale-VT100-Terminal-Reproduction/

Reply via email to