Steve,

Tapes were definitely expensive enough to be reused, but for something as 
important as system software source code, people tended to keep them and rotate 
through backup tapes. 7- and 9-track tapes each had a parity bit and 6 or 8 
bits of data. I believe they attempted to distribute the original Fortran 
compiler (1957) as a deck of “binary” punched cards, but had trouble with the 
card punches and duplicating equipment handling so many holes.

> On Mar 3, 2026, at 5:19 PM, Steve Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Fantastic, thanks for sharing that Paul !
> 
> I see "SOS" (SHARE OS) from 1959 and expected it was a similar workflow:  
> initially on punched cards, intermediate fixes done on tape, then back to 
> cards-- for a brief time, wouldn't tapes be a form of your storage space? so 
> as you were "done" with the system - or a program completed and moved to the 
> next batch-sequence - someone else could re-use the tape? (I recall earlier 
> OS's, maybe CTSS, being like that -- if you logged out without saving your 
> workspace, you'd lose it )   Then c. 1962ish, SOS morphed into IBM IBSYS.  By 
> that point, maybe nearly all the interactive development was done on 7 or 
> 9-track?   ( was there an 8-track?  I think Univac had an 8-track at same 
> point? )
> 
> I have seen the 1401 demo at CHM, so this helps put it more into perspective. 
>   
> 
> -Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 4:47 PM Paul McJones via cctalk <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> As a student at UC Berkeley (1967-1971), I had a part-time job at the 
>> Computer Center, which ran a CDC 6400 under SCOPE. We punched cards, 
>> transferred them to magnetic tape, and used UPDATE to maintain logical 
>> decks. I personally used this technology while working on CAL SNOBOL and CAL 
>> TSS. Once we got CAL TSS far enough along to support development (on a 
>> second CDC 6400), we switched to Teletypes (a mixture of Model 33’s and 
>> Model 35’s). I still have source code for CAL SNOBOL because of archivists 
>> at U. of Arizona and U. of Texas, but most of the source code for CAL TSS 
>> was lost (listings survive).
>> 
>> 
>> Paul McJones
>> 
>> https://www.mcjones.org/CAL_SNOBOL/
>> https://caltss.computerhistory.org/

Reply via email to