Internationally, this model of decision making is widely practiced, especially when dealing with ad-interim decisions. Usually this is done when a decision is made not through a general meeting or a general voting, and the party(es) issuing that decision only posses partial authority to enforce the content of that decision.
For the everyday example, the governance of student organization in school is usually done that way. The president of the student body can declare that every monday all students are required to wear white socks. He/she is allowed to make such declaration, yet does not have full authority to enforce it. So that kind of decision is usually declared saying something like "I decided that it will be a very good thing to practice discipline in our school. Thus starting next month, on every monday all students must wear white socks. If anyone objects to this decision, please file your objection to the student body office within the end of this month" And if there's no objection, at the end of the month the president can say "Because there is no objection, starting next monday, everyone have to wear white socks on every monday". By doing this, the claim of authority has went unchallenged and placed into effect. I believe that's exactly what your ccNSO Council is doing. Regards, Irwan Effendi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Budi Rahardjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 7:41 AM Subject: [ccTLD-ID] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [cctld-discuss] Question on Accountability Frameworks] > ----- Forwarded message from Stephan Welzel/Denic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004 > From: Stephan Welzel/Denic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:37:56 +0100 > Subject: [cctld-discuss] Question on Accountability Frameworks > > All, > > I have a question on the Accountability Frameworks Guidelines and assume > that mainly the ccNSO members among you will be able to answer it: > > At http://www.ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-06jan06.html > ICANN states: > > "On 14 December 2005, the ccNSO Council resolved to publish the > Accountability Framework Working Group Interim Report as guidelines for > ccTLD managers to consider when discussing an accountability framework > with ICANN. On 19 December 2005, the Council published the resolution to > the ccNSO members list and as seven days has lapsed since this publication > without objection the guidelines are now operational." > > Can anyone explain to me > > 1. what the statement is supposed to mean that the guidelines are now > "operational"? > 2. what kind of procedure it is according to which something becomes > "operational" if not objected to? > 3. in what bylaws, guidelines, documents, whatever this procedure is > outlined? > > Thanks in advance, > Stephan > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > Untuk unsubscribe: kirim e-mail ke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > dengan Subject: unsubscribe > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Untuk unsubscribe: kirim e-mail ke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dengan Subject: unsubscribe ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
