On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Egon Willighagen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > what should we do with 'old', 'unreviewed' patches? Those patches that > have been in the tracker for a long time, and have not seen any > comment by reviewers, and as such, patches that are not requested to > be revised? > > Should we create a time out of, say, three months? So that patches > that do not have a large user community get applied automatically?
That is nice - but we're possibly going to get lots of merge failures if the patches have been lying around too long. In such a case I suspect that a patch will, by default, never get applied :) -- Rajarshi Guha NIH Chemical Genomics Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
