Was the unit test for this bug report applied? On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Egon Willighagen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Rajarshi Guha <[email protected]> wrote: >> This could be a problem in the morgan numbering - that was where the >> last problem was > > Yes, and/or the unique numbering scheme in the CDK based on top of the > non-unique Morgan numbers... > > To everyone, we could really use some good unit testing for both code > bits in the CDK... > > Egon > > > -- > Dr E.L. Willighagen > Postdoctoral Researcher > Institutet för miljömedicin > Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm) > Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ > LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw > Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ > PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers >
-- Rajarshi Guha NIH Chemical Genomics Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
