> Sounds like two different semantics of compare method; obviously both have > reasons to exist. The authors know better, but the current implementation > seems to have in mind e.g. graph algorithms, where atoms are distinct graph > nodes. The other interpretation, comparing atoms themselves is useful, but a > bit trickier - should it include equality of atom symbols only, or atom > types, aromaticity flags, bond flags, 3D coordinates of atoms, etc? IMHO > matcher classes are better suited for this purpose.
So perhaps rename the method to clearly state that it is comparing identity? -- // Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
