From: Len Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Burnfree option Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:23:15 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi, what I heard one time was, that if burnfree is triggered by a buffer underrun (which cause the laser beam to pause), a small (very small) gap is produced after the beam is switched on afterwards. A "master" produced that way cannot be used as a real master for professional mass production. For any other usage it is as good as others. If one would ask me: I prefer a not-so-absolutely-pefect but working burned CD in opposite to coasters.... May be I am not a purist... ;O) keep hacking! Meino lsorense> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:18:54AM +0100, Isidro Cachadi?a Guti?rrez wrote: lsorense> > This is a wish. Why the burnfree option is disabled by default?. lsorense> > Why is not enabled by default? lsorense> lsorense> Some drives drop their max write speed when it is enabled. I don't know lsorense> if the linking system used by the burnfre systems can cause any lsorense> compatibility problems with picky readers either. Either one would be a lsorense> good reason to not use it by default. If your machine is fast enough, lsorense> you don't need it. lsorense> lsorense> Len Sorensen lsorense> lsorense> lsorense> -- lsorense> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] lsorense> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] lsorense> lsorense> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
