>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 15 17:26:12 2003 >> >mkisofs -B on the other hand does "cover" SPARC boot block[s] "by" value >> >returned by isoinfo. But even if ISO9660 partition of Solaris boot CD >> >was prepared with mkisofs, there're UFS partitions which are surely >> >appended by *separate* means and therefore resulting layout can hardly >> >be classified as "*mastered* with mkisofs." In other words I'm not >> >convinced that my statement doesn't hold true. "Sane block count" is >> >still the last *significant* block even for Solaris boot CD. And as long >> >as output from mkisofs is fed *immediately* to recording program, value >> >returned by isoinfo is suitable for discussed purposes. A. >> >> Why don't you first read README.sparcbot before starting to guess?
>And why don't you ever *read* what's written? I did, but you did not read the posting I wrote before. The reason _why_ I mentioned the Solaris boot CD was that isoinfo's outout cannot be used to copy such disk correctly. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]