Thanos Kyritsis píše v st 01. 12. 2004 v 18:31 +0200: > On Wednesday 01 December 2004 17:49, Markus Plail wrote: > > That's because tests showed that the Plextor drives are the only ones > > giving significant results, that correlate with the results given by > > really professional equipment. Instead of using the LiteOn drives you > > can also use a random number generator ;-) > > Are you talking about personal tests or tests made by some "formal" > resource like Anandtech for example ?? > > If it is the second case, could I have the URLs please ?? :) > If it is the first case, could you please post some > graphs/plots/results ??
According to articles on rather good webmag cdr.cz (sorry, czech only)
Lite-ON units are inconsistent in PI/PO results. They tested a lot of
units and found out that some of them (say, 50%) return accurate
results, and some of them (say, remaining 50%) return absolutely bogus
values.
No idea if Plextor units always return accurate results, but results
from tested Plextor units match results from the first half of Lite-ON
units. Does not look like accident.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The final screw holding up a rackmount server is always possessed by demons.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
