On Tuesday 27 January 2004 20:39, Robert S. Dubinski wrote: > The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard document version 2.3 of the Linux > Standard Base project (http://www.linuxbase.org/) lists the > following:
As a matter of fact, there is also this document: http://www.tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/usr.html Now, which one is the right one ?? If FHS is the "right" one, it's obvious it's not complete, but on the contrary it's too general and fails to set a suitable standard for modern Linux distros. Well, I think what Joerg wants to say is clear: Some standard needs to finally direct everyone as to where the running kernel sources are. There are many applications that need the running kernel sources and not /usr/include/linux. -- Kyritsis Athanasios <djart at linux.gr> Studying Electrical & Computer Engineering @ Univ. of Patras, Greece