[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let me take the occasion to show to you the due politeness and
> respect by informing you in advance about my upcoming cdrecord
> compatibility wrapper around libburn: cdrskin .
What kind of advantage should this have?
Cdrecord is opensource and portable to 30 different platforms.
> A problem is that the frontends want to see some words
> like "Cdrecord" and "Copyright" in order to recognize a
> program as cdrecord compatible. So i have to issue something like
> cdrskin 0.1.1 : limited cdrecord compatibility wrapper for libburn
> Cdrecord 2.01-Emulation Copyright (C) 2006, see libburn + cdrskin
>
> After K3b made from this line out of cdrskin's first -version text
> "Cdrecord-Emulation 2.01 Copyright (C) 2006 Thomas Schmitt"
> the following text line
Why do you spend time on this?
What problem does it solve that cannot be solved by cdrecord?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
