I believe we should look into build cegcc with either uclibc or newlib,
no?
Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:09:14 -0700
> From: "Steve DeLaney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Cegcc-devel] A few loose ends
> To: <cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Hi there, well I am continuing to build more stuff. Generally this is
> going
> well but I noted a few
> loose ends
>
> A) missing select.h in /opt/cegcc install. Copied from the cegcc newlib
> includes
> B) missing select.h in /opt/cegcc install. Copied from x86 FC6
> C) missing regex.h in /opt/cegcc install. Copied from the cegcc newlib
> includes
> D) missing some symbols in resource.h - was able to patch the needed
> symbols
> from x86 FC6
>
> But now some symbols are missing for regex APIs (regcomp, regexec,
> refgree)
> Should I download and build regex from sourceforge?
>
> http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/regex.htm
>
>
> /steverino2
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
