On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 04:11 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 04 September 2008 19:47:09, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > After that, I'd like opinions about removing the gdb source tree from
> > our svn (but keeping gdb in binary distributions).
>
> Yay! Please do remove it.
>
> I've contributed the proper gdb and gdbserver ports upstream for well over
> a year now (!), and close to nobody seems to be benefiting from it :-/
One of the last messages I found from you about gdb said you still had
some work that wasn't committed. I don't know what it was about. This
made me believe it wasn't entirely done, but your reply now indicates
that it is. Are there still rough edges ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
