The src/gcc-4.4.0 tree contains stuff which I believe to work, except
when you target WinCE > 6.1 and try to build e.g. C++ DLLs.
The toolset does still produce working results, in my experience, for
WinCE 6.5 if you avoid such DLLs. And it works for C++ if WinCE <= 6.1.
But this is from memory, I may have forgotten some aspects.
Note that I can provide SVN write access on the cegcc project for those
who want to do real work on it.
Danny
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 06:11 +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Well, ok, should have read the list archive a bit more ;-). Pedro
> Alves' cleanup: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.cegcc.devel/2839
>
> I'd still ask for other parties' patchsets, as that one is year's old,
> and for gcc only apparently.
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:55:23 +0200
> Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to ask people who worked on producing a cegcc
> > patchset/porting cegcc to newer versions of binutils/gcc to share any
> > results they have, no matter how incomplete or preliminary they are
> > (I in particular cc: Pavel Pavlov who worked on this at the summer
> > per his posts to the mailing list). Just seeing size of patches and
> > curious peek inside can give info/motivation someone needs to
> > continue the work.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Paul mailto:[email protected]
>
>
>
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
