Hello, On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:04:43 +0100 Vincent Richomme <foru...@smartmobili.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > You should discuss with mingw-w64 folks and especially with Kai Tietz > because > he was interested in including mingw32ce inside their repository. > It would be great to do so because some features that have been > included into > mingw-w64 could be backported to cegcc (SEH exceptions, unicode > startup). > I already added some files their and you should have a look. I tried to look at what mingw-w64 uses for w32api (did they fork it? do they maintain upstream connection?), but among first google hits I found discussion of licensing quality concerns with mingw-w64 headers, and I didn't look further. Can you give some hints regarding what you added where - I'm pretty overloaded with information, so that's helpful. I'm so far concentrating on w32api, because that's IMHO the most lacking part of cegcc now - out of 2 (native) apps I tried, none built OOB, and one required heavy header patching. But exception handling was my next concern, because if SEH isn't supported, cegcc can't replace proprietary compiler, and I still don't have clear picture regarding that in cegcc, though presense of *sjlj*.dll somehow hints... OTOH, that thread which I refer to (around http://lists-archives.org/mingw-users/18900-yet-another-mingwrt-w32api-provenance-discussion.html ) mentioned that w64 does use sjlj, while original mingw dwarf2 EH... > -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel