Hi, This thread has been quiet for some time now, so I post to get the attention back. As far as I can see Celix is ready for a first release. Is anything holding us back?
Greetings, Pepijn On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Pepijn Noltes <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Alexander Broekhuis < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Maybe not mentioned explicitly before, but I think it makes sense to do >> only a source release of Celix. >> > > I agree. > > >> >> Things I have done: >> > * Update all headers (license and source headers) to the correct format. >> > This includes replacing all personal names with a reference to the >> Celix >> > Project Team. >> > * Removed the Eclipse files (project and launch files. >> > These files are not portable enough to be added to the repo. >> > I've tested the CMake project file generation, this works but.. see >> some >> > remarks in a previous email. >> > * Created the LICENSE file >> > This needs some extra checking. As far as I can tell I have added all >> > license for specific files we use in the codebase. >> > > I double checked this and I think you got all the licenses. > > >> > * Created the KEYS file >> > For signing the release a key is needed, I created one for myself and >> > added it to the KEYS file. >> > >> >> Update: >> * Added the DISCLAIMER file >> * Added the NOTICE file >> * Updated BUILDING >> >> As far as I can tell the repository now contains all required files. Can >> anyone check this? >> >> A question concerning encryption: >> The zip files used support decryption, the header mentions: >> >> The encryption/decryption parts of this source code (as opposed to the >> >> non-echoing password parts) were originally written in Europe. The >> >> whole source package can be freely distributed, including from the USA. >> >> (Prior to January 2000, re-export from the US was a violation of US >> law.) >> >> Does Celix need to make an additional notice somewhere about this? >> >> >> Is there anything else missing? Or should I go on and create a RC tag and >> release file? >> > > I did find a small issue. The file celix/framework/private/src/unzip.c > contains the text "For more info read MiniZip_info.txt", but this file is > not present in the source tree. Should we add it ?. > > Expect for the small issue mentioned above I could not find anything > missing and therefore IMO Celix is ready for a RC tag. > > > Greetings, > Pepijn > > >
