Ken Tilton wrote:
Peter Hildebrandt wrote:
Sounds good. I wasn't sure as to whether I understood what I was
doing. I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at all*
if I did it the way I suggested.
OK.
That was with test-gtk -- my favorite test case.
I hacked up not-to-be a little (tho nothing fundamentally different than
what I recall of your efforts which I cannot find in my email), moved
cells-store out into its own source file (update your asd!), reran the
cells regression test and test-gtk -- everything works.
Mind you there may not be a non-.kids owning test anywhere in there, or
even anything that verifies that the .kids are getting quiesced, but
your report above of "I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to
kids *at all*" does not say /how/ you saw that, so maybe there is still
non-propagation which is not being exposed by the test suite and still
needs to be cured.
yep. I think I am seeing it myself. stay tuned.
this is probably, btw, something about load-time vs compile-time, with
me propagating :ownings at compile-time and not getting those on a
reload... nope, just a total mess from the beginning, hairy rewrite
underway.
kt
_______________________________________________
cells-devel site list
cells-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel
