Hi Stu, On 6/11/08, Stu Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not the lack of documentation. I don't even know where to start.
That's how we keep the newbies out :-) > Where is the main web page for each of cells, celtk, cello, and > cells-gtk? cells, celtk, cello only really exist in CVS: http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=cells#dirlist cells-gtk is not too hard to find: http://common-lisp.net/project/cells-gtk > Where are the source code repositories for each? CVS, cells, celtk, cello see above. cells-gtk is linked on the cells-gtk project page. > Is there > a central location for the tidbits of documentation that exist? There is the cells-manifesto and examples in the cells CVS. There is the primer and FAQ linked from the cells-gtk project page. There is the example application and demo test-gtk in the cells-gtk cvs. > Also, what's the status of each. Actively developed, "finished", or > left to rot? A piece of art is never finished. :-) cells: "mature and stable" says the cells-manifesto. Ken adds stuff as required. cells-gtk: beta, semi-actively developed (i.e. whenever a bug comes up or we miss functionality, we add it) cells-ode: close to 1.0 (I don't know what to add right now) > KT, which are you working on the most? That, and the status of celtk/cello be left to Himself :) HTH, Peter > P.S. It would be real nice to have a canonical git repository for each > on github or gitorious. I know CVS is quite old and people use darcs, git, svn, and mercurial these days, but what advantage is it exactly that we would get from migrating to git? > _______________________________________________ > cells-devel site list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel > _______________________________________________ cells-devel site list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel
