On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Kenneth Tilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Unless you have pushed :allegro onto *features* you should not be hitting > excl: usage (those are Franz "ex"tensions to "cl"). I think any you find can > safely be zapped since they will be in debugging code only. > There are a couple of places where EXCL is referred to unconditionally. I added tests for ccl and that made it happy. > Hunh, surprised that MOP:: is there unfeatured. I am sure CCL has > class-prototype somewhere, but ISTR it either is in the CL package so you > can just delete the MOP:: or it is in... well, I'll let you find out: > (apropos "CLASS-PROTOTYPE") > > Yes, ccl has class-prototype. I deleted the mop::, and got past that hurdle. There were a couple more in a similar vein that I also fixed. I got a compile error in fm-utilities.lisp compiling fm-find-one. CCL complained about the declaration of dynamic-extent for 'matcher'. I added ccl to the #-lispworks test, and it compiled OK. Whether that's important at runtime, I don't know. Anyway, it now loads without any errors. Now to see if I can use it in my project. Thanks for the help, Neil Baylis -- http://www.pixpopuli.com
_______________________________________________ cells-devel site list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel
