Ramarren wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vuko...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I have downloaded cells2.0 from cliki. > > As far as I can tell cells 2.0 is not linked from cliki, although it > is from the homepage. In any case, it is really old. The latest > original version is in CVS and is marked as 3.0. I believe it has > improved data integrity for certain cases (well, according to > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/c0afdb359ffed6a7 in > this case "has improved" means "adds" but supposedly it usually works > anyway).
Ah, 3 added integrity? Well, when I added it I did it all in one go, so it should be pretty solid on those edge cases that broke 2. Not sure what 4 added, then. maybe the flattening of recursion into a fifo queue of changes? Yes, 2 worked for an incredibly long time, but it does have a hole closed by 3 so who needs the uncertainty? kt > >> On the mailing list, I see another branch mentioned (Ramarren). I >> gather that as long as I don't care about GTK, that should not be an >> issue. > > My branch of Cells themselves is just a number of cosmetic fixes for > Cells 3.0 (well, as it is in CVS it doesn't work on anything except > Lispworks, but those are cosmetic-level changes anyway). The commit > list is here: http://github.com/Ramarren/cells/commits/master , mostly > it make SBCL emit less warnings and improves support for other > implementations. > > Regards, > Jakub Higersberger > > _______________________________________________ > cells-devel site list > cells-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel > _______________________________________________ cells-devel site list cells-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel
