Opinions <https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions>
How the GOP’s dishonesty led to the rise of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz
Resize Text

Print Article

Comments 1475

<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-the-gops-dishonesty-led-to-the-rise-of-donald-trump-and-ted-cruz/2016/01/28/d0bfdf8c-c5fb-11e5-a4aa-f25866ba0dc6_story.html?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_opinions#>
Book mark article

Read later list
 Saved to Reading List

Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump and Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) at
a debate this month in North Charleston, S.C. (Rainier Ehrhardt/Associated
Press)
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/fareed-zakaria>
By Fareed Zakaria <http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/fareed-zakaria> Opinion
writer January 28

To understand why the current conservative crack-up so confounds the
Republican establishment, you have to recognize that the party is facing
two separate but simultaneous revolts: one led by Ted Cruz, the other by
Donald Trump.

The first is well described by E.J. Dionne Jr. in his important new book, “Why
the Right Went Wrong
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1476763798/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1476763798&linkCode=as2&tag=thewaspos09-20&linkId=WXHWBKGHENEQ5VP4>.”
For six decades, he explains, conservatives promised their voters that they
were going to roll back big government. In the 1950s and early ’60s, they
ran against the New Deal (Social Security). Then they railed against the
Great Society (Medicare). Today it is Obamacare.
Fareed Zakaria writes a foreign affairs column for The Post. He is also the
host of CNN’s Fareed Zakaria GPS and a contributing editor for The
Atlantic. View Archive <http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/fareed-zakaria>

   - Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/fareedzakaria>
   - RSS
   <http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/rss/linksets/opinions/fareed-zakaria>

But they never actually did anything. Despite nominating Goldwater and
electing Nixon, Reagan and two Bushes, despite a congressional revolution
led by Newt Gingrich, these programs endured, and new ones were created.

*[E.J. Dionne: The monumental fall of the Republican Party
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-decline-and-fall-of-the-gop/2016/01/20/d6e1a95a-bfbf-11e5-9443-7074c3645405_story.html>]*

The simple reason for this is that while Americans might oppose the welfare
state in theory, in practice they like it. And the bulk of government
spending is on the middle class, not the poor. Social Security and Medicare
<http://www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics-where-do-our-federal-tax-dollars-go>take
up more than twice as much of the federal budget
<https://www.nationalpriorities.org/budget-basics/federal-budget-101/spending/>
as
allnon-defense discretionary spending
<http://www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics-non-defense-discretionary-programs?fa=view&id=3973>
.
One middle-class tax exemption
<https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/113th-congress-2013-2014/reports/TaxExpenditures_One-Column.pdf>—
foremployer-based health care
<http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/04/14/the-worst-tax-breaks/end-the-exemption-for-employer-provided-health-care>—
costs the federal government more than three times the total for the food
stamp  <http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/SNAPsummary.pdf>
program.
The last debate before Iowa caucuses in less than 3 minutes
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-the-gops-dishonesty-led-to-the-rise-of-donald-trump-and-ted-cruz/2016/01/28/d0bfdf8c-c5fb-11e5-a4aa-f25866ba0dc6_story.html?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_opinions#>
Play Video2:52
Republican presidential candidates weighed in on immigration, the Islamic
State, criminal justice reform and - of course - Donald Trump at the Fox
News debate in Des Moines, Iowa on Jan. 28. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington
Post)

Whatever the reality, Republicans kept promising something to their base
but never delivered. This has led to what Dionne calls the “great
betrayal.” Party activists are enraged, feel hoodwinked and view those in
Washington as a bunch of corrupt compromisers. They want someone who will
finally deliver on the promise of repeal and rollback.

Enter Cruz. How did a first-term senator, despised within his party both in
Washington and Texas, get so far so fast? By promising to take on the party
elites and finally throttle big government. Cruz has said that he will
repeal Obamacare, abolish the IRS  <https://www.tedcruz.org/tax_plan/>and
propose a constitutional amendment
<https://www.tedcruz.org/five-for-freedom/> to balance the budget — which
would mean hundreds of billions of dollars in spending cuts.

Trump’s supporters, on the other hand, are old-fashioned economic liberals.
In a powerful analysis, drawing on recent survey data from the Rand
Corp.,Michael
Tesler
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/01/27/a-newly-released-poll-shows-the-populist-power-of-donald-trump/>
shows
that the Trump voter is very different from the Cruz voter. “Cruz
outperforms Trump by about 15 percentage points among the most economically
conservative Republicans,” he writes. “But Cruz loses to Trump by over
30 points among the quarter of Republicans who hold progressive positions
on health care, taxes, the minimum wage and unions.”Trump is well aware of
this fact
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/debate-over-medicare-social-security-other-federal-benefits-divides-gop/2015/11/04/166619a8-824e-11e5-a7ca-6ab6ec20f839_story.html>,
which explains why he has said repeatedly he won’t touch Social Security
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-gop-candidates-social-security> or
Medicare, spoke fondly of the Canadian single-payer system, denounces high
chief executive salaries, promises to build infrastructure and opposes
free-trade deals.

*[For the sake of the GOP, both Trump and Cruz must lose
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/giving-strength-and-momentum-to-prejudice/2016/01/18/2c35c596-be0b-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html>]*

Trump’s voters reflect an entirely different revolt. Since the 1960s, some
members of the United States’ white middle and working classes have felt
uncomfortable with the changes afoot in the country. They were uneasy with
the social revolutions of the 1960s, dismayed by black protests and urban
violence, and enraged by the increasing tide of immigrants, many of them
Hispanic. In recent years, they have expressed hostility toward Muslims. It
is this group of Americans — many of them registered Democrats and
independents — who make up the core of support for Trump. (Obviously there
are overlaps between the two candidates’ supporters, but the divergences
are striking.)

In his analysis, Tesler
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/01/27/a-newly-released-poll-shows-the-populist-power-of-donald-trump/>shows
that, statistically, “Trump performs best among Americans who express more
resentment toward African Americans and immigrants and who tend to evaluate
whites more favorably than minority groups.” The New York Times’s Nate Cohn
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/31/upshot/donald-trumps-strongest-supporters-a-certain-kind-of-democrat.html?_r=0>points
out that Trump’s support geographically is almost the opposite of that of
the last major populist businessman to run for president, Ross Perot. Perot
did well in the West and New England, but poorly in the South and
industrial North. Trump’s support follows a different but familiar pattern.
Cohn writes: “It is similar to a map of the tendency toward racism by
region.” To be clear, many people back Trump for reasons entirely unrelated
to race, religion or ethnicity, but the correlations shown by scholars are
striking.

Could these revolts have been prevented? Perhaps, if the Republican Party
had been honest with its voters and explained that the welfare state was
here to stay, that free markets need government regulation, and that the
empowerment of minorities and women was inevitable and beneficial. Its role
was to manage these changes so that they develop organically, are not
excessive and preserve enduring American values. But that is the role for a
party that is genuinely conservative, rather than radical.
[image: Inline image 1][image: Inline image 2]Top quotes from the seventh
Republican presidential debate
View Photos
The candidates shared these comments during the Fox News Republican primary
debate in Des Moines, Iowa.

*Read more from Fareed Zakaria’s archive
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/fareed-zakaria>, follow him on
Twitter <https://twitter.com/fareedzakaria> orsubscribe to his updates on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/fareedzakaria>.*

*Read more on this issue:*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Center for Good Governance" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/center-for-good-governance.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to