Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:12:20 -0400: > > > I think you are mixing the versions up or made a typo, > > yes, I meant to write "Xen < 3.2". > > > My configs still have xenbr0 listed, but the scripts will take any > > xenbr* and convert it to eth* if it exists and is a bridge. I don't > > have any problem with DHCP. I also have iptables currently disabled. > > Before going to the new Xen I tried to use this explanation for building a > bridge for xend, but it doesn't work for me at all :-( > http://henning.schmiedehausen.org/wingnut-diaries/archives/86 > Unfortunately, bridge interfaces are missing from the Red Hat Deployment > Guide, I'm still looking for a guide about what can be used in bridge ifcfg > files. What I see on the net looks completely different. > > Oh, and you were absolutely right about the routing. I changed the default > gateway to fit the public subnet and added a static route for the private > subnet and now the additional src in ip route list is gone. Didn't change > that > the DHCPOFFER doesn't get back to the VM, though :-(
Kai, Why not try tcpdump on the bridge interface and see if you can see the DHCPOFFER/DHCPACK and what MACs it used. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt