On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
> On 10/16/2010 08:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:16:42PM +0100, Bart Swedrowski wrote: > >> Hi Karanbir, > >> > >> On 14 October 2010 19:59, Karanbir Singh<mail-li...@karan.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 10/14/2010 07:48 AM, Tom Bishop wrote: > >>>> I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and > features....now > >>> > >>> that is indeed what it 'feels' like, but I'm quite keen on putting some > >>> numbers on that. > >> > >> I have done some testing some time ago on one of the EQ machines that > >> I got from hetzner.de. Full spec of the machine was as following: > > > > Note that 64bit Xen guests should be HVM, not PV, for best performance. > > Xen HVM guests obviously still need to have PV-on-HVM drivers installed. > > > > 32bit Xen guests can be PV. > > Hm, why would HVM be faster than PV for 64 bit guests? > > Regards, > Dennis > lol, there's seems to be a lot of hearsay surrounding performance and Xen. Grant McWilliams Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems.
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
