No, it isn't. I think we should go through * Round the call for any additional agenda items * Action Updates * Bug tracker * RPM subpackage structure Lars
On 20/05/2014 12:02, Jonathan Ludlam wrote: > If it's not too late to add agenda items now, could we talk about the > structure of the RPM subpackages? > > In particular, some folks here at Citrix have spent some time fixing up our > xen RPM such that the subpackages have a more useful split - for example, > there is a now distinction between xen-libs and xen-dom0-libs - where the > former has libraries useful in all domains, e.g. libxenstore and libvchan, > and the latter has libraries that are _only_ useful for dom0. There are a few > other changes that have been made, and I was wondering what the appetite was > for convergence, and where the problems will lie if we were to pursue this. > > Thanks, > > Jon > > > > ________________________________________ > From: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org [centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] on > behalf of Lars Kurth [lars.ku...@xen.org] > Sent: 19 May 2014 07:35 > To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS > Subject: [CentOS-virt] Call for agenda items for tomorrow's VIRT SIG meeting > > Hi all, > please reply to this thread of you have any agenda items that you would > like to add. Meeting minutes of past minutes are under > * http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization "Meetings" > * The TODO list is under > http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Status (just > updated it) > * Draft roadmap is under "Roadmap" and probably needs formalizing > Lars > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
