Greetings, ----- Original Message ----- > Thanks a lot, for your replies, my boss is a big fan of lxc, but I > have read many forums, and what I perceive is rhel7 -> docker, > centos7 ---> openvz > > With great difficulty, I managed a container with virt-manager, I > even noticed a bug when trying to create a bridge. > > Conclusion, as we want to use a container operating system is better > to use openvz, now is there interfaces that allow a user no expert > reserve resources such as memory, cpu, etc without going to browse > cgroups?
Just to clarify, the OpenVZ kernel runs fine on RHEL(5&6) too. In fact I have a couple of RHEL hosts running OpenVZ. So far as resource management goes, in the EL6-based OpenVZ kernel, vSwap-based configuration/management is preferred whereas in the EL5-based kernel (which OpenVZ is EOL'ing in Oct. I think), user_beancounters are what you have. vzctl's resource management facilities do what the vast majority of container users need. vzctl-core is available for non-OpenVZ kernels but it is missing quite a few features compared to when run on an OpenVZ-based kernel. See: https://wiki.openvz.org/Vzctl_for_upstream_kernel I don't think it is well tested on upstream kernels. TYL, -- Scott Dowdle 704 Church Street Belgrade, MT 59714 (406)388-0827 [home] (406)994-3931 [work] _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
