I got an email back from the apache dev who applied the patch in the changelog.
Basically, html which is run thru mod_include will not get an etag header by
design. The patch that he applied fixed a wrong behavior in how late the ETag
header is dropped. Exempt files which need ETag headers with Location or
Directory directives if they are run thru mod_include (Or don't have a
braindead config which runs all files thru mod_include).
Patrick
p.s. Oh, and sorry for replying to my own post!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Flaherty, Patrick
Sent: Fri 9/14/2007 8:01 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Apache 2.2.3 ETag weirdness.
I'm looking to clarify this entry I found in a changelog(line 2062ish) on a
CentOS 5 box for Apache 2.2.3
*) mod_include no longer allows an ETag header on 304 responses.
PR 19355. [Geoffrey Young <geoff apache.org>, André Malo]
Loading the mod_include module prevents any ETags headers from being sent from
the box. If I comment out mod_include, ETags are sent as expected. CentOS 4
2.0.59 with mod_include does not show the same behavior, and ETags are sent
both with and without mod_include loaded.
If anyone can tell me the correct behavior, and if I need to file a bug I'd
apreciate it. My assumption was anyfiles with an <!--- include ---> statement
would not get an ETag, but regular html without includes would be fine.
Best
Patrick
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
