James A. Peltier wrote: > No that's the thing, I did read it. I just kept thinking, "no I'm using > 5.0", but DUH! when 5.1 was released the rsync for /5 started to point > to 5.1 and hence didn't work. I'm an idiot more because even after I > read it I didn't put together the correlation. I can happily laugh > about it now though. DOH! ;D >
if you are rsync'ing againt the /5/ target, your [base] repo should have updated as well, was that not the case ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
