On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: > MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the > case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.
How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believe that some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files. Ted Miller Elkhart, IN _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
