On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jim Perrin <jper...@centos.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> That seems pretty dangerous if the packages replace standard or EPEL
>> libraries/components. I'd have expected them to have some sort of
>> namespace concept for dependencies to keep the sets of packages
>> completely independent. That is, I thought being independent was the
>> point. Shouldn't you be able to have multiple versions installed?
>>
>
> I consider this a bug, as the SCL's should be self-contained. We'd need
> to see if this occurs upstream as well, and then file a bug there if so.
>
There's really a bigger issue of how EPEL is supposed to fit in the
world of 'other' repositories. What should happen when
centosplus/extras has a same-named package? Other 3rd parties?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
