On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 14:05 -0500, William Woods wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Always Learning <cen...@u62.u22.net> wrote: > > C 5 works well for me. > > > > Centos 5 Fan :-) > That is probably the most pointless comment you have made yet. Just because > you use something, and you are a fan does not mean anything in the context > of the discussion. On the contrary it means a discerning user like me, never adverse to complaining, is satisfied with the quality product C 5 undoubtedly is. And satisfied sufficiently to use it instead of C6 and C7. Elsewhere you subsequently mentioned, after your apparently derogatory remark about C5 being "ancient" that ancient does not mean bad. I concur. Have a nice day. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
