On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Greg Lindahl <lind...@pbm.com> wrote: > >> > > A third source is companies with homegrown code deployed on CentOS > > servers and poor-quality test suites. They tend to be in the "omg > > never change anything unless forced at gunpoint!" camp. It's an > > unfortunate situation, and it can cost a lot of money and time to fix. > > >Or even with decent test suites you recognize that you can't perfectly > >mulate a live internet-connected production environment. Or you've > >been burned by updates that did break things and the time it took to > >f>nd a workaround. There's just no getting around complicated systems > >being complicated. Hence the need for immutable infrastructure. vu > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
