Le 10/02/2015 15:35, Niki Kovacs a écrit :


So far, no way to bring either eth0 or eth1 up. What am I doing wrong
here? Is NetworkManager now a mandatory part of the base system? Some
other mistake somewhere else? I'm a bit puzzled here.


I'll answer that myself, after some more experimenting. Apparently, reverting to the traditional ethX interface naming scheme creates some unexpected behavior. I decided to keep the new persistent naming scheme (enp2s0 and enp3s1 on my server), and from there, everything works like expected.

Niki

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to